Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2019

    while I am at it…

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2019

    I have added statement of the integral cohomology ring of BSO(3)B SO(3) (thanks to David R. for discussion), following Brown 82, or I hope I did:

    H (BSO(3),)[p 1,W 3]/(2W 3), H^\bullet\big( B SO(3), \mathbb{Z} \big) \;\simeq\; \mathbb{Z}\big[ p_1, W_3\big] / (2 W_3) \,,

    Brown’s Theorem 1.5 has a last tedious clause with a relation satisfied by the cup product of two SW classes. It looks to me that the whole clause collapses to nothing in the present case. But needs to be double checked.

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2019
    • (edited Apr 1st 2019)

    Here’s another source

    Mark Feshbach, The Integral Cohomology Rings of the Classifying Spaces of O(n) and SO(n), Indiana Univ. Math. J. 32 (1983), 511-516. doi:10.1512/iumj.1983.32.32036

    The generators are indeed as you say. The relations are complicated, but I think they all turn out to be (except for 2W 3=02W_3=0) vacuous, for n=3n=3… I think.

    Here is another source, that looks a bit more tractable. If that Google Books link is not readable, it’s Section 4.2 of Differential Geometry and Mathematical Physics: Part II. Fibre Bundles, Topology and Gauge Fields by Gerd Rudolph and Matthias Schmidt (doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0959-8)

    Edit: Hmm, it looks to be open access. Try this link to go to the section in HTML format.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2019

    Remark of Rudolph–Schmidt’s book, together with Theorem 4.2.23 and Corollary 4.2.24 I think close the deal. It seems 2W 3=02W_3=0 is the only relation, so that the cohomology ring is [p 1,W 3]/(2W 3)\mathbb{Z}[p_1,W_3]/(2W_3).

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 1st 2019

    Thanks again!

    Yes, that book Rudolph-Schmidt shows some more effort to polish-up the statement of the theorem.

    It seems to be a nice book, generally. Have added pointer to it to a bunch of nLab pages now.