Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: 8-manifold

Bottom of Page

1 to 7 of 7

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 23rd 2019

    am starting an entry here in order to record some facts. Not done yet

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 23rd 2019
    • (edited Mar 23rd 2019)

    added statement of this fact (here)

    Let XX be a closed connected 8-manifold. Then XX has G-structure for G=G = Spin(5) if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:

    1. The second and sixth Stiefel-Whitney classes (of the tangent bundle) vanish

      w 2=0AAAw 6=0 w_2 \;=\; 0 \phantom{AAA} w_6 \;=\; 0

    2. The Euler class χ\chi (of the tangent bundle) evaluated on XX (hence the Euler characteristic of XX) is proportional to I8 evaluated on XX:

      8χ[X] =192⋅I 8[X] =4(p 2−12(p 1) 2)[X] \begin{aligned} 8 \chi[X] &= 192 \cdot I_8[X] \\ & = 4 \Big( p_2 - \tfrac{1}{2}\big(p_1\big)^2 \Big)[X] \end{aligned}

    3. The Euler characteristic is divisible by 4:

      χ[X]=0∈ℤ/4 \chi[X] \;=\; 0 \;\in\; \mathbb{Z}/4

    v1, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 23rd 2019
    • (edited Mar 23rd 2019)

    added statement of this fact (here):

    Let XX be a closed connected spin 8-manifold. Then XX has G-structure for G=G = Spin(4)

    BSpin(4) TX^↗ ↓ X ⟶TX BSpin(8) \array{ && B Spin(4) \\ & {}^{\mathllap{ \widehat{T X} }} \nearrow & \big\downarrow \\ X & \underset{T X}{\longrightarrow} & B Spin(8) }

    if and only if the following conditions are satisfied:

    1. the sixth Stiefel-Whitney class of the tangent bundle vanishes

      w 6(TX)=0 w_6(T X) \;=\; 0

    2. the Euler class of the tangent bundle vanishes

      χ 8(TX)=0 \chi_8(T X) \;=\; 0

    3. the I8-term evaluated on XX is divisible as:

      132(p 2−(12(p 1) 2))∈ℤ \tfrac{1}{32} \Big( p_2 - \big( \tfrac{1}{2} \big( p_1 \big)^2 \big) \Big) \;\in\; \mathbb{Z}

    4. there exists an integer k∈ℤk \in \mathbb{Z} such that

      1. p 2=(2k−1) 2(12p 1) 2p_2 = (2k - 1)^2 \left( \tfrac{1}{2} p_1 \right)^2;

      2. 13k(k+2)p 2[X]∈ℤ\tfrac{1}{3} k (k+2) p_2[X] \;\in\; \mathbb{Z}.

    Moreover, in this case we have for T^X\widehat T X a given Spin(4)-structure as in (eq:Spin4Structure) and setting

    G˜ 4≔12χ 4(TX^)+14p 1(TX) \widetilde G_4 \;\coloneqq\; \tfrac{1}{2} \chi_4(\widehat{T X}) + \tfrac{1}{4}p_1(T X)

    for χ 4\chi_4 the Euler class on BSpin(4)B Spin(4) (which is an integral class, by this Prop.)

    the following relations:

    1. G˜ 4\tilde G_4 (eq:TildeG4) is an integer multiple of the first fractional Pontryagin class by the factor kk from above:

      G˜ 4=k⋅12p 1 \widetilde G_4 \;=\; k \cdot \tfrac{1}{2}p_1

    2. The (mod-2 reduction followed by) the Steenrod operation Sq 2Sq^2 on G˜ 4\widetilde G_4 (eq:TildeG4) vanishes:

      Sq 2(G˜ 4)=0 Sq^2 \left( \widetilde G_4 \right) \;=\; 0

    3. the shifted square of G˜ 4\tilde G_4 (eq:TildeG4) evaluated on XX is a multiple of 8:

      18((G˜ 4) 2−G˜ 4(12p 1)[X])∈ℤ \tfrac{1}{8} \left( \left( \widetilde G_4 \right)^2 - \widetilde G_4 \big( \tfrac{1}{2} p_1\big)[X] \right) \;\in\; \mathbb{Z}

    4. The I8-term is related to the shifted square of G˜ 4\widetilde G_4 by

      $$ 4 \Big( \left( \widetilde G_4 \right)^2 - \widetilde G_4 \left( \tfrac{1}{2}p_1 \right) \Big) \;=\; \Big( p_2

      • \big( \tfrac{1}{2}p_1 \big)^2 \Big) $$

    diff, v2, current

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 23rd 2019
    • (edited Mar 23rd 2019)

    added a brief mentioning of 8-manifolds with exotic boundary 7-spheres (here) – so far just a glorified pointer to

    diff, v5, current

  5. Note that the signature of an 8-manifold need not necessarily be 1 or -1. Take for example the spheres S^{4k}, k a positive integer, which has signature 0.

    Cole Durham

    diff, v12, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 9th 2020
    • (edited Sep 9th 2020)

    Thanks for catching.

    (This statement was copy-and-pasted from discussion of Milnor’s construction of exotic 7-spheres, where the signature is ±1\pm 1.)

    So I have fixed the actual formula now.

    diff, v13, current

  7. Added example section and added 8-sphere and SU(3).

    diff, v14, current

1 to 7 of 7

  1.