Noted that Cahiers also specialises in categories.

]]>Added Documenta Mathematica.

]]>Added IMRN.

]]>Added Transactions of the AMS.

]]>Relocated Fundamenta to a more appropriate position.

]]>Just to highlight that, again, this new item probably deserves to be moved away from the top position in that list.

]]>Fundamenta Mathematicae added ; note that the online first version is free

Philippe Gaucher

]]>Moved Extracta further down the list.

]]>So is the last addition – *Extracta Mathematicae* – the most prolific homotopy/category theory journal, before TAC?

I suspect it’s not and that it’s not meant to be, instead that P. Gaucher in #54 also didn’t spot the ordering instruction. Maybe I am wrong, just bringing this up to attention.

]]>Thanks. I see. So I have moved that comment to right before the list, where one can spot it (here)

]]>Re #55: It is stated at the top:

The general plan for the ordering of journals below should be roughly in the decreasing order of the number of articles they publish in the area of homotopy theory and category theory, as witnessed by the MathSciNet statistics.

]]>Is there a hidden ordering to the list?

]]>Extracta Mathematicae added

Philippe Gaucher

]]>Separate into “currently publishing” and “previously publishing”.

]]>Add Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences.

]]>renamed page to “list of journals publishing homotopy theory and category theory”

Anonymous

]]>I agree with Dmitri.

I doubt that applied category theorists (for example) would all consider themselves doing algebraic topology.

]]>with AlgTop the common ground where category theory and homotopy theory meet

Is this really the case? Many journals would happily publish an algebraic topology paper (for example, something on surgery of manifolds, which is unambiguously classified as algebraic topology), but are quite hostile (in the relative sense of a likelihood of publishing) to homotopy theory, and even more so to category theory. G&T is the prime example (it certainly does publish algebraic topology papers), and there are many others.

“Journals on” is appropriate for journals whose primary focus is on the indicated topic, but I wouldn’t say Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society or New York Journal of Mathematics (both are present in the list) is a journal on algebraic topology.

Of course, what is important here is not that journals publish, but rather that they are relatively more likely to accept a paper in the indicated topics. “Journals receptive to category theory” may be more precise, though looks slightly weird.

I agree with removing “list of”.

]]>re #46:

To avoid a lengthy page title, how about naming it just

“**list of journals publishing algebraic topology**”

with AlgTop the common ground where category theory and homotopy theory meet.

Incidentally,

we don’t need to say “list of” in a title

it’s redundant to say that a journal publishes,

so that the title should really be something like

“**journals on algebraic topology**”

Added Awodey to JSL editors

Jonas Frey

]]>This journal list has silently become a list of journals publishing homotopy theory as well as category theory.

Indeed, many journals are primarily focused on homotopy theory, especially those with “Topology” or “Homotopy” in the title.

I propose to rename this article to “list of journals publishing category theory and homotopy theory”, especially since the journal challenges faced by homotopy theorists are essentially the same as that of category theorists.

]]>Updated the published for Higher Structures.

]]>Added Journal of Topology.

]]>Deleted a note about topic subdivision that is no longer relevant.

]]>