Yes. Thanks. I have fixed it now (here).

]]>In definition 1.16, subsequence should be defined as *order-preserving* injection, isn’t it? As in sequence.

Anonymous’, I see that you fixed a typo in the formula here.

Thanks for that.

But why is it that you duplicate my log message from #8? What’s going on here? Is this intentional or is this due to a funny glitch in the software that I am unaware of?

]]>Thanks!!

I have (here) fixed a typo you introduced (:-) and further adjusted the wording a little, for clarity.

Anonymous’

]]>Example 2.29, ∂(a,b) should be equal to ∂[a,b]={a,b}.

Example 6.2, inclusions became projections on the second diagram.

Example 6.10, inconsistent names for functions f,g/f1,f2 throughout ]]>

Now I notice that the very last line of the entry appears un-rendered, as literal code

```
[[!include topology - contents]]
```

This is probably caused by some syntax error somewhwhere inside the source code.

Usually such errors can be spotted easily by the fact that everything after them appears garbled, but in the present case all else seems to be rendering well, so I don’t readily see how to fix this issue.

]]>Thanks!!

I have (here) fixed a typo you introduced (:-) and further adjusted the wording a little, for clarity.

]]>homogenized some confusion between generic ground field vs real numbers in the definition of topological vector bundle.

Jonas Frey

]]>Thanks for all this!

]]>Fixed typos.

am813nt

]]>Fixed more typos.

am813nt

]]>Fixed some typos.

am813nt

]]>[duplicate, page was saving slowly]

]]>Have fixed a typo in the wording of the proof of this Prop, which was kinldy pointed out in another thread (here).

]]>