Added some links to lawvere cylinder

]]>Fixed reference to wrong chapter

Anonymous

]]>Added a reference to Cisinski’s 2020 book.

]]>Corrected the description of the minimal Cisinski model structure.

]]>In the description of the minimal Cisinski model structure, changed “generating acyclic cofibration” to “generating anodyne extension”.

]]>Expanded on the “minimal Cisinski model structure” to include the description of the generating acyclic cofibrations.

]]>Prefaced the “Cofibration followed by an acyclic fibration” with the elementary construction of functoral factorization via partial map classifier.

]]>Added a short ideas section.

]]>Lightened the wording.

]]>Fixed a typo

]]>Thanks! I’ve added this to cellular model too.

]]>The case of Grothendieck abelian categories and Grothendieck toposes is also treated in Prop. 1.12 in Tibor Beke’s paper https://faculty.uml.edu/tbeke/sheafi.pdf

]]>Added definition of homotopical datum (donnée homotopique), which seemed to be missing. Gave the example of the minimal Cisinski model structure on any presheaf category. Left the latter as a page to be created.

]]>Thanks! My French isn’t quite good enough for that to have jumped out at me. (-:O

]]>Great! Yes, at the beginning of section 2, the second sentence translates to something like:

“We have omitted those proofs already given in the setting of presheaf categories which can be given mutatis mutandis in that of sheaf categories, referring the reader to [Cisinski’s book]”.

]]>Added that unpublished reference to the page.

]]>Thanks! It’s stated there as Prop. 1.2.2, without proof (but, as I said, I think the proof in Cisinski 06 generalizes without trouble).

]]>Just a quick note that Cisinski generalised some of his work to topoi in this unpublished work, but it’s a long time since I’ve looked at it, and I don’t know if what you are looking for is in there.

]]>The statement at Cisinski model structure about cellular models (proposition 2.34 on the page, prop. 1.2.27 in Cisinski 06) refers to *presheaf* toposes. However, it seems to me that the same fact should be true about arbitrary Grothendieck toposes (that the monomorphisms are cofibrantly generated by a set), by essentially the same proof using the sheafified representables instead of the ordinary representables. Is this true, and if so is it written down anywhere?

Finish proof of [Cisinski 06, lemma 1.3.34], already started in the previous edit whithout comment, now only correcting typos.

Gábor Braun

]]>Can we describe the ∞-category underlying a Cisinski model structure in terms of its topos and localizer?

As far as I understand, for a nonempty localizer the Cisinski model structure is the left Bousfield localization of the Cisinski model structure with the empty localizer at the morphisms in the localizer, which has an obvious ∞-categorical translation in terms of (reflective) localizations.

However, what is the ∞-categorical meaning of the Cisinski model structure with the empty localizer?

Staring at the examples it seems to me that for toposes of presheaves the underlying ∞-category should be just the ∞-category of ∞-presheaves. And for arbitrary toposes one can expect to get some version of ∞-sheaves, hypercompleted or not.

]]>added the remark that every Cisinski model structure is in particular combinatorial (and added an Examples-link the other way round).

]]>Added to *Cisinski model structure* a handful of items on “localizers” on presheaf categories, *here*

Good to hear that you find this useful. Right now I need these notes as a script for a seminar talk where I will present the proof – or at least a good bit of it…

This morning, I have added a few more bits. The main new aspect for any potential reader is that I have added much more structure to the flow of the argument, see the new section outline at *Cisinki model structure* and the outline of the proof of the main theorem *here*. (Where “main theorem” still means “main theorem of section 1.3”, mind you.)

The main remaining gap as far as details for the proofs go is currently the last section. I’ll try to take care of that now.

]]>