nForum - Discussion Feed (classical limit)2024-03-29T02:03:56+00:00https://nforum.ncatlab.org/
Lussumo Vanilla & Feed Publisher
Urs comments on "classical limit" (2067)https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/310/?Focus=2067#Comment_20672009-11-03T13:23:01+00:002024-03-29T02:03:56+00:00Urshttps://nforum.ncatlab.org/account/4/
Interesting thought. I wasn't aware of that ealy conversation.
Interesting thought. I wasn't aware of that ealy conversation.
]]>
David_Corfield comments on "classical limit" (2065)https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/310/?Focus=2065#Comment_20652009-11-03T12:20:45+00:002024-03-29T02:03:56+00:00David_Corfieldhttps://nforum.ncatlab.org/account/20/
Any further thoughts on that early conversation of ours, after I asked "Can one characterise decoherence in terms of the way a symmetric monoidal category with duals 'looks' cartesian when one ...
Any further thoughts on that early conversation of ours, after I asked "Can one characterise decoherence in terms of the way a symmetric monoidal category with duals 'looks' cartesian when one forms the tensor product of sufficiently many objects?"
]]>
Urs comments on "classical limit" (2061)https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/310/?Focus=2061#Comment_20612009-11-03T00:09:14+00:002024-03-29T02:03:56+00:00Urshttps://nforum.ncatlab.org/account/4/
started classical limit
started classical limit
]]>