]]>
Guest comments on "Galois connection" (96639)https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/4056/?Focus=96639#Comment_966392021-11-12T13:32:10+00:002024-03-28T21:03:10+00:00Guesthttps://nforum.ncatlab.org/account/21/
At the end of the article, at the beginning of the References section, the word "concent" should be "concept", no?6. ReferencesThe concent is due toØystein Ore, Galois connexions ...
At the end of the article, at the beginning of the References section, the word "concent" should be "concept", no?
6. References The concent is due to
Øystein Ore, Galois connexions , Trans. AMS 55 (1944) pp.493-513. (pdf)
]]>
David_Corfield comments on "Galois connection" (76269)https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/4056/?Focus=76269#Comment_762692019-02-26T23:20:30+00:002024-03-28T21:03:10+00:00David_Corfieldhttps://nforum.ncatlab.org/account/20/
I can’t see why this section isn’t displaying properly. Or is it just my browser?
Edit: Ah, I fixed the missing ’]’.
I can’t see why this section isn’t displaying properly. Or is it just my browser?
Edit: Ah, I fixed the missing ’]’.
]]>
Stephan A Spahn comments on "Galois connection" (33180)https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/4056/?Focus=33180#Comment_331802012-08-21T19:48:03+00:002024-03-28T21:03:10+00:00Stephan A Spahnhttps://nforum.ncatlab.org/account/408/
I added to Galois connection the remark that some authors call an adjunction between posets a *monotone Galois connection* and a dual adjunction between posets an *antitone Galois connection*.
I added to Galois connection the remark that some authors call an adjunction between posets a *monotone Galois connection* and a dual adjunction between posets an *antitone Galois connection*.
]]>