I'm inclined to say that if it fits into measure and probability theory for you, then you may as well include that Context. That said, I am surprised that it fits in (same with Feynman diagram); and now that I've looked, I'm also surprised to see thermodynamics listed under that heading (although there the connection seems closer).
So I don't expect you to explain the connection to justify including that Context. But I'm still interested to hear why you did it.
]]>Yes.
]]>Would you have the same question about Feynman diagram?
]]>Do you really take that this belongs to the context of “measure and probability theory” (I know it can if stretched, bit then so much can…) as the ftoc witnesses ? I am a bit puzzled.
]]>stub for virtual particle, just for completeness
]]>