The statement at the entry was never wrong, I think. It did take care to state what should be true and then mentioned an aspect of this as a fact. This doesn't preclude that more is true, indeed. But certainly the entry was very stubby.
So thanks for asking on mathoverflow. Hopefully somebody finds the energy to incorporate the good answers given there into the entry! Harry, how about you?
]]>I added in some vague wording, referencing that MathOverflow question's answers.
]]>