Yes. Further down in the entry it was correct. I have fixed it now.
[ Wait, no, this was correct as stated at that point: is self-adjoint. On the other hand, the text would deserve to be expanded for clarity, but I leave it as is for the time being. ]
]]>Are the correct canonical commutation relations supposed to be instead of ?
]]>started some basics at Weyl relations, added brief cross links to canonical commutation relations and Stone-von Neumann theorem.
]]>