Author: Richard Williamson Format: MarkdownItexA bare beginning, will fill in more later.
<a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Galois+category/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Galois+category">current</a>
Author: Richard Williamson Format: MarkdownItexCompleted the second definition of a Galois category, and a remark on the choice of axioms. Will give the details of the theorem relating the two as soon as possible.
<a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Galois+category/2">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Galois+category/2">v2</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Galois+category">current</a>
Completed the second definition of a Galois category, and a remark on the choice of axioms. Will give the details of the theorem relating the two as soon as possible.
Author: nLab edit announcer Format: MarkdownItexClarified the third point in the definition of the Galois category. Previously, the entry said that there exist morphisms $u$ and $v$, but did not say that their composite was supposed to be $f$.
Alex Betts
<a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Galois+category/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Galois+category/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Galois+category">current</a>
Clarified the third point in the definition of the Galois category. Previously, the entry said that there exist morphisms $u$ and $v$, but did not say that their composite was supposed to be $f$.