Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory kan lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology natural nforum nlab nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topological topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 6th 2021
    • (edited May 6th 2021)

    With David Corfield and Hisham Sati we are finalizing an article:

    \,

    \,

    The title refers to a proof presented, that all fundamental gl(n)-weight systems on horizontal chord diagrams are states with respect to the star-involution of reversion of strands.

    But the bulk of the article rephrases this theorem and its proof as a special case of a more general statement in geometric group theory: characterizing the (non/semi-)positive definite phases of the Cayley distance kernel on the symmetric group.

    Finally, a last section recalls from Sati, Schreiber 2019c the original motivation and interpretation of this result: Under Hypothesis H it proves, from first principles, that a pair of coincident M5-branes (transversal on a pp-wave background, as in the BMN matrix model) indeed do form a (bound) state. This is of course generally expected, but there did not use to be a theory to derive this from first principles.

    \,

    Comments are welcome. If you do take a look, please grab the latest version of the file from behind the above link.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 7th 2021

    This just made it into Dror Bar-Natan’s Pensieve:

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 17th 2021

    Example 3.11

    • should be λ rows(λ)\lambda_{rows(\lambda)} at end of first bracket
    • in 1), should be “labels to fill its first column”
    • in 2) should be “any labelling of the first column”
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 17th 2021
    • (edited May 17th 2021)

    respectivey

    We close with briefly explaining

    ’by’ sounds better than ’with’

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2021

    Thanks, fixed now locally. I’ll upload after adding a pointer to Jucys’ theorem which we have re-derived…