Author: Urs Format: MarkdownItexDear Anonymous,
on the off chance that you are reading the nForum, just to say that I had a question for you ([here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14589/the-real-projective-spaces-in-homotopy-type-theory/#Item_2), [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14586/the-join-construction/#Item_2), [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14576/modalities-in-homotopy-type-theory/#Item_2), [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14577/localization-in-homotopy-type-theory/#Item_3), [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14582/univalent-categories-and-the-rezk-completion/#Item_2), [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14588/higher-groups-in-homotopy-type-theory/#Item_4), [here](https://nforum.ncatlab.org/discussion/14587/cellular-cohomology-in-homotopy-type-theory/#Item_3)):
Do you agree that the suggested formatting of your reference items looks much better?
Dear Anonymous,
on the off chance that you are reading the nForum, just to say that I had a question for you (here, here, here, here, here, here, here):
Do you agree that the suggested formatting of your reference items looks much better?