Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorKevin Lin
   • CommentTimeJul 20th 2010
   • (edited Jul 20th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Kevin Lin
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat notation should I use for constant sheaves? Is there a standard notation for this in the nLab? I have been using underlines, e.g., $\underline{\mathbb{C}}$.

   What notation should I use for constant sheaves? Is there a standard notation for this in the nLab? I have been using underlines, e.g., $\underline{\mathbb{C}}$.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 20th 2010
   • (edited Jul 20th 2010)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexGenerally, it's difficult to try to establish and probably dangerous to rely on conventions across nLab pages. With so many people editing at different points in time and space, we are not going to succeed in implementing a real standard. Which doesn't mean we can't try. But I think best practice would be if every entry tries to briefly state its notation convention in some way or other. Somewhere I wrote $const A$ for a constant sheaf on $A$, to be real self-explanatory. But of course that't not nice notation. I'd say that underline is certain very standard for constant sheaves and so we should freely use it. But adding a brief comment on notation in each entry would still be good anyway.

   Generally, it’s difficult to try to establish and probably dangerous to rely on conventions across nLab pages. With so many people editing at different points in time and space, we are not going to succeed in implementing a real standard.

   Which doesn’t mean we can’t try. But I think best practice would be if every entry tries to briefly state its notation convention in some way or other.

   Somewhere I wrote $const A$ for a constant sheaf on $A$, to be real self-explanatory. But of course that’t not nice notation.

   I’d say that underline is certain very standard for constant sheaves and so we should freely use it. But adding a brief comment on notation in each entry would still be good anyway.