Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Thanks.
Have added pointer to a couple of reviews:
N. Lambert et al., Quantum biology, Nature Physics 9 (2013) 10–18 [doi:10.1038/nphys2474]
Y. Kim, Quantum Biology: An Update and Perspective, Quantum Rep. 3 1 (2021) 80-126 [doi:10.3390/quantum3010006]
and pointers to articles that call into question the claim of coherent entanglement relevant in photosynthesis:
H.-G. Duan et al., Nature does not rely on long-lived electronic quantum coherence for photosynthetic energy transfer, PNAS 114 32 (2017) 8493-8498 [doi:10.1073/pnas.1702261114]
J. Cao et al., Quantum biology revisited, Science Advances 6 14 (2020) [doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz4888]
Have accordingly adjusted the wording in the respective paragraph here.
(But I am just going by a glance over these articles. Experts should please chime in.)
also added hyperlinks for this item:
Added a reference
assuming this is the same Michael Levin that we already have an entry for, I have hyperlinked the author name
No it’s not. I’d better disambiguate.
Oh, I see. Thanks. Two Michael Levins in quantum systems.
1 to 7 of 7