Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeNov 30th 2023
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexunder "Relation to the Weyl algebra" ([here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Heisenberg+Lie+algebra#RelationToTheWeylAlgebra)) it used to say (I wrote this, some time ago) without qualification that the universal envelope of the Heisenberg algeba becomes the Weyl algebra only after identifying the extra central generator with the unit in the ground field. But this depends on convention: If the Weyl algebra is regarded as the formal deformation quantization of the given symplectic vector space, then the central element is the formal parameter $\hbar$ of the deformation and not identified with the unit. I have adjusted the wording and added a couple of (so far somewhat random) references whose authors regard the situation in this second sense. The same discussion should be had at *[[Weyl algebra]]* and under "Examples" at *[[universal enveloping algebra]]*. Maybe it is worth splitting this example off as a separate page and re-`!include` it in these entries. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Heisenberg+Lie+algebra/12">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Heisenberg+Lie+algebra/12">v12</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Heisenberg+Lie+algebra">current</a>

   under “Relation to the Weyl algebra” (here) it used to say (I wrote this, some time ago) without qualification that the universal envelope of the Heisenberg algeba becomes the Weyl algebra only after identifying the extra central generator with the unit in the ground field.

   But this depends on convention: If the Weyl algebra is regarded as the formal deformation quantization of the given symplectic vector space, then the central element is the formal parameter $\hbar$ of the deformation and not identified with the unit.

   I have adjusted the wording and added a couple of (so far somewhat random) references whose authors regard the situation in this second sense.

   The same discussion should be had at Weyl algebra and under “Examples” at universal enveloping algebra. Maybe it is worth splitting this example off as a separate page and re-!include it in these entries.

   diff, v12, current