Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthornLab edit announcer
   • CommentTimeOct 24th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: nLab edit announcer
   Format: MarkdownItexstarting page on $\mathbb{Z}$-functors Anonymouse <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Z-functor/1">v1</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Z-functor">current</a>

   starting page on $\mathbb{Z}$-functors

   Anonymouse

   v1, current

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeOct 25th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexIt seems, some obscure terminology.

   It seems, some obscure terminology.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 27th 2024
   • (edited Oct 27th 2024)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexYeah, it's not particularly convincing terminology. Also, it clashes with the terminology of *[[Z-categories]]*.

   Yeah, it’s not particularly convincing terminology. Also, it clashes with the terminology of Z-categories.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeOct 27th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexMoreover, one wonders whether small (pre)sheaves, rather than all presheaves, might give the better concept, without running into size issues.

   Moreover, one wonders whether small (pre)sheaves, rather than all presheaves, might give the better concept, without running into size issues.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeOct 28th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI had a vague memory of this and I checked now, the terminology originates from Demazure-Gabriel famous functorial treatise on algebraic geometry and algebraic groups. They work with universes so the smallness is accounted for appropriately.

   I had a vague memory of this and I checked now, the terminology originates from Demazure-Gabriel famous functorial treatise on algebraic geometry and algebraic groups. They work with universes so the smallness is accounted for appropriately.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeOct 28th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI meant small in the sense of being a small colimit of representables, not valued in small sets, in case that wasn't clear. I see from [this MathOverflow answer](https://mathoverflow.net/a/121091/4177) D&G are imposing the constraint that a Z-functor is only defined on a subcategory of "very small" rings, relative to the smaller of a pair of universes.

   I meant small in the sense of being a small colimit of representables, not valued in small sets, in case that wasn’t clear. I see from this MathOverflow answer D&G are imposing the constraint that a Z-functor is only defined on a subcategory of “very small” rings, relative to the smaller of a pair of universes.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeOct 29th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexSo I have added pointer to Demazure & Gabriel, and at the top a disambiguation warning regarding functors between Z-categories. <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/diff/Z-functor/3">diff</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/revision/Z-functor/3">v3</a>, <a href="https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Z-functor">current</a>

   So I have added pointer to Demazure & Gabriel, and at the top a disambiguation warning regarding functors between Z-categories.

   diff, v3, current

8. • CommentRowNumber8.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeOct 29th 2024
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItex6 Oh, right, I forgot about that.

   6 Oh, right, I forgot about that.