Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2010

    I guess I should know this, but when asked today I couldn’t give a good answer:

    What can we say about putting two inequivalent structures of a Lie group on a given bare group?

    A maybe related basic question: are the exotic 4\mathbb{R}^4s still in any way canonically Lie groups?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2010

    Of course: as bare groups, \mathbb{R} and ×\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} are isomorphic.

    As for exotic 4\mathbb{R}^4: no, they are not.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2010

    Of course: as bare groups, \mathbb{R} and ×\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} are isomorphic.

    Ah, of course. Thanks. We identify the underlying sets using the Peano curve and then of course the group structure of \mathbb{R} induces a wild (smoothly speaking) group structure on ×\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2010

    Wait, let me see. I am looking for an example (or not) of two different Lie group structures whose underlying bare group structure coincides.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2010

    I think Todd meant to consider both \mathbb{R} and ×\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R} with their usual group structures. They are isomorphic because both are vector spaces of dimension 2 02^{\aleph_0} over \mathbb{Q}.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2010

    Ah, right. Thanks.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 5th 2010

    aded a remark along these lines to Lie group