Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 29th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI don't suppose there is any way to configure the nForum to show an entire longish discussion on one page, instead of breaking it up every 50 comments? It makes it difficult for me to continue a discussion across the breaking-point, without much benefit as far as I can see.

   I don’t suppose there is any way to configure the nForum to show an entire longish discussion on one page, instead of breaking it up every 50 comments? It makes it difficult for me to continue a discussion across the breaking-point, without much benefit as far as I can see.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJan 30th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexHear, hear!

   Hear, hear!

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeJan 31st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexGood idea!

   Good idea!

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorAndrew Stacey
   • CommentTimeJan 31st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Andrew Stacey
   Format: MarkdownItexWithout messing around with the internals, the most it allows me to raise it to is 100 so I've done that. If you really want _all_ comments, I'll have to mess around with the code which will take a little longer to do (I'm not unwilling to do so, though, if asked).

   Without messing around with the internals, the most it allows me to raise it to is 100 so I’ve done that. If you really want all comments, I’ll have to mess around with the code which will take a little longer to do (I’m not unwilling to do so, though, if asked).

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJan 31st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexI'd definitely prefer to have all of them, but 100 is better than 50. We do have a few discussions that go on past 100 comments.

   I’d definitely prefer to have all of them, but 100 is better than 50. We do have a few discussions that go on past 100 comments.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItex> the most it allows me to raise it to is 100 so I've done that Strange, aren't the computers in binary :) I'd expect limit of 128 or alike... (just joke, I understand the usage of constants in the source code)

   the most it allows me to raise it to is 100 so I’ve done that

   Strange, aren’t the computers in binary :) I’d expect limit of 128 or alike… (just joke, I understand the usage of constants in the source code)

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeFeb 5th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexI agree with Mike, but it's probably not worth the trouble of extending beyond 100.

   I agree with Mike, but it’s probably not worth the trouble of extending beyond 100.