Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive constructive-mathematics cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 14th 2011
    • (edited Apr 14th 2011)

    I was forced to split off the section on infinitesimal cohesion from the entry cohesive (infinity,1)-topos – because after I had expanded it a little more, the nLab server was completely refusing to safe the entry (instead of just being absurdly slow with doing so). I guessed that it is was its length that caused the software to choke on it, and it seems I was right. The split-off subsection is now here:

    cohesive (infinity,1)-topos – infinitesimal cohesion

    Things I have edited:

    • added a bried Idea-paragraph at the beginning;

    • changed the terminology from “\infty-Lie algebroid” to “formally cohesive infinity-groupoid” , making the former a special case (first order) of the latter;

    • expanded the definition of formal smoothness, added remarks on formal unramifiedness in the \infty-context.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 14th 2011
    • (edited Apr 14th 2011)

    polished this and that and then made the general de Rham theorem for \infty-stacks explicit in the section Flat oo-connections

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeApr 29th 2011
    • (edited Apr 29th 2011)

    I have added at cohesive (infinity,1)-topos – infinitesimal cohesion the closure properties of abstract formally étale morphisms (under 2/3rds of two-out-of-three, under retracts, and under \infty-pullbacks): in this proposition

    This is the straightforward generalization of the corresponding 1-categorical discussion at formally etale morphism

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2011
    • (edited May 2nd 2011)

    I have improved (here) the discussion of the proof that intrinsically defined formally étale morphisms are closed under retract (using the refined discussion at retract)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2011
    • (edited Jun 17th 2011)

    am starting a section Jet bundle objects at infinitesimal cohesion .

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2011

    I see in several forum discussions today you wrote Jet with capital letter (I understand here is a section title), is there a secret reason or just accidentaly this happens ? (ignore the question if no reason)

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJun 17th 2011

    yes, sorry, my fingers kept doing this. I was wondering myself why that was happening ;-)

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)