Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 3rd 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexstarted an entry [[looping and delooping]] in an attempt to bring statements together in one place that are currently a bit scattered over the $n$Lab. Not done yet, but need to quit now.

   started an entry looping and delooping in an attempt to bring statements together in one place that are currently a bit scattered over the $n$Lab. Not done yet, but need to quit now.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorjim_stasheff
   • CommentTimeJun 6th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: jim_stasheff
   Format: TextTried to edit don't know if it worked

   Tried to edit
   don't know if it worked
3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 6th 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHi Jim, yes, your edits did work. You asked in the Idea-section which definition of loops and which definition of delooping is meant. But the idea is that in the "Idea"-section I don't want to specify technical details, but just ideas ;-) To hopefully make this clearer, I have added the following sentence > What all these terms ("loops" $\Omega$, "delooping" $B$ etc.) mean in detail and how they are _presented_ concretely depends on the given setup. We discuss some of these below in the section _Examples_ . Is that better?

   Hi Jim,

   yes, your edits did work.

   You asked in the Idea-section which definition of loops and which definition of delooping is meant. But the idea is that in the “Idea”-section I don’t want to specify technical details, but just ideas ;-)

   To hopefully make this clearer, I have added the following sentence

   What all these terms (“loops” $\Omega$, “delooping” $B$ etc.) mean in detail and how they are presented concretely depends on the given setup. We discuss some of these below in the section Examples .

   Is that better?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 21st 2011
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have slightly polished and expanded at [[looping and delooping]] the part about "in parameterized $\infty$-groupoids"

   I have slightly polished and expanded at looping and delooping the part about “in parameterized $\infty$-groupoids”

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 16th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have added ([here](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/looping#ForPlainGroupsDeloopingToGroupoids)) an exposition which spells out in detail the equivalence $$ Grp \stackrel{\underoverset{\simeq}{\pi_1 = \Omega_\ast}{\longleftarrow}}{\underset{\mathbf{B}}{\longrightarrow}} Grpd^{\ast/}_{\geq 1} $$ As usual there are choices to be made in the notation as to whether $\mathbf{B}G$ has composition given by multiplication from the left or from the right, and whether $Ad_h$ is $h^{-1} (-)h$ or the other way around, and one tends to end up wondering which combination of conventions leads to a minimum of $(-)^{-1}$-symbols. I don't claim that I got that minimum, but I want to leave it as is for the moment.

   I have added (here) an exposition which spells out in detail the equivalence

   $$Grp \stackrel{\underoverset{\simeq}{\pi_1 = \Omega_\ast}{\longleftarrow}}{\underset{\mathbf{B}}{\longrightarrow}} Grpd^{\ast/}_{\geq 1}$$

   As usual there are choices to be made in the notation as to whether $\mathbf{B}G$ has composition given by multiplication from the left or from the right, and whether $Ad_h$ is $h^{-1} (-)h$ or the other way around, and one tends to end up wondering which combination of conventions leads to a minimum of $(-)^{-1}$-symbols. I don’t claim that I got that minimum, but I want to leave it as is for the moment.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeApr 16th 2015
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI have also copied this over to _[[geometry of physics -- groups]]_, where I'll be adding some more glue to it.

   I have also copied this over to geometry of physics – groups, where I’ll be adding some more glue to it.