Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 4th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownCreated [[diagrammatic order]]. I attempted to strike a neutral tone in describing the dispute, but if you think I failed, please help.

   Created diagrammatic order. I attempted to strike a neutral tone in describing the dispute, but if you think I failed, please help.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeNov 5th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownThis was already being discussed at [[composition]]. Not that it shouldn't have its own page, but I linked them back and forth.

   This was already being discussed at composition. Not that it shouldn't have its own page, but I linked them back and forth.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 5th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownWhat a good thing we have lab elves. Do you think they should be put together? If I'd noticed [[composition]] I would probably have just redirected [[diagrammatic order]] to it.

   What a good thing we have lab elves. Do you think they should be put together? If I'd noticed composition I would probably have just redirected diagrammatic order to it.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeNov 5th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownI'd be inclined to put it all at composition, although I could imagine that we might want to separate them again one day. After all, there is more potentially to discuss at [[composition]] that these notational details; it might have a lot to say eventually about the <latex>n</latex> different directions in which to compose <latex>n</latex>-morphisms, for example.

   I'd be inclined to put it all at composition, although I could imagine that we might want to separate them again one day. After all, there is more potentially to discuss at composition that these notational details; it might have a lot to say eventually about the different directions in which to compose -morphisms, for example.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeNov 16th 2009
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownI merged [[diagrammatic order]] into [[composition]], and added a bit about bias.

   I merged diagrammatic order into composition, and added a bit about bias.