# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeNov 28th 2011

I noticed that we are lacking C-infinity algebra, so I very briefly created a very stubby stub (no time right now…)

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorzskoda
• CommentTimeNov 28th 2011
• (edited Nov 28th 2011)

Why $C^\infty$ (referring tothe idea section) and not the logical $C_\infty$ in parallel with $A_\infty$-algebras. Merkulov I think has lower subscript consistently in both cases. Then there is no problem with $C^\infty$-rings in the sense of smooth. I remind you that there is also notation $G_\infty$ (lower subscript!!) for Gerstenhaber-infinity algebras.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeNov 28th 2011

Sure, thanks. I was in a haste. Is fixed now.

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorzskoda
• CommentTimeNov 28th 2011

Then do the same please in cafe. Thanks, I am relieved, I was thinking that Bruno used that notation, and I am so much fond of his precision and clarity. Thank you again for transmitting Bruno’s lecture in $n$Lab for the rest of us.

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
• CommentTimeDec 14th 2020

Added a disambiguation line at the top.

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
• CommentTimeDec 14th 2020

Added a disambiguation line at the top.

• CommentRowNumber7.
• CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
• CommentTimeDec 15th 2020

Trying to see if C_∞-algebra is a better title…