Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Every category – indeed, every simplicial set – admits a homotopy final functor into it out of a Reedy category, namely its category of simplices (HTT 4.2.3.14). This makes me wonder: can every -topos be presented as a localization of an -topos of presheaves on a Reedy category?
You mean by a possibly non-lex localization, right? (Because by this proposition lex localizations of -presheaves over 1-sites are 1-localic. )
I guess I would have to mean that, wouldn’t I? (-:
And I guess with that point made, it makes sense to ask the question more generally about locally presentable -categories. I’m thinking of something like this: suppose C is a small -category and its category of simplices; then we have a functor sending each simplex to the last object occurring in it. This induces a functor , and every object in the image of this functor has the property that it sees as isomorphisms all the maps in which fix the last object. Consider the localization of which forces all these maps to be invertible; it seems as though that has a decent chance to be equivalent to ?
At least in the 1-categorical case, this is true. The functor has a left adjoint (left Kan extension), and by C3.3.8(i) in the Elephant, it is fully faithful; thus it exhibits as a reflective subcategory of . Does C3.3.8(i) have an -categorical analogue?
1 to 5 of 5