Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
I added a reference to globular set.
I have edited globular set a little, trying to prettyfie the exposition mainly. Also added another line or two to the Idea-section and added another reference.
Is anything known about globular sets in terms of Grothendieck homotopy theory? For instance, is the category of globes a weak test category, a test category, or a strict test category?
I’m pretty sure it is provably not a test category. Just now I’m not sure of a reference, I’ll see if I can remember one later.
That’s what I thought I remembered too, but I don’t know the reference either. My intuition is that the boundary of a globular set is “too simple to encode composition” the way (say) simplices and cubes do.
This is discussed in Scholie 8.4.14 in Cisinski’s Astérisque 308.
Something is seriously broken on the nLab. It appears that new edits edit the second-to-the-last version instead of the latest one!
1 to 10 of 10