Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 27th 2012
    • (edited May 14th 2014)

    I am starting something on U-duality at supergravity.

    But all still very skeletal at the moment.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2014

    I have split off U-duality to a stand-alone entry, added some more references and more hyperlinks (but otherwise the text is as before) and pointed to this from all of the relevant entries E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

    So this relates to your Google+ comments on exceptional objects and M-theory.

    We heard from John McKay once

    Study of the sporadics leads me to conclude that we ought to examine the role of the Schur multiplier. For the three sporadics M, B, F24’ the multipliers are L*/L, L = root lattice for E8,7,6 respectively.

    And I heard him once relate

    1. Symplectic geometry: There’s a correspondence between (E8, E7, E6) and (Monster, Baby monster, Fischer group Fi24) and with

    (120 tritangents on sextic of genus 4, 28 bitangents on quartic, 27 lines on cubic).

    And 360 cusps link to the 120 tritangents.

    Others have looked to relate E8 and the Monster, e.g., A moonshine path from E8 to the monster and Arithmetic groups and the affine E8 Dynkin diagram. Makes you wonder what might be possible for the higher Es.

    By the way, is there a reason at E11, why the series stops

    … E6, E7, E8, E9, E10, E11, ?

    What happens? It can continue to E12 and beyond, but that’s no longer nice in some sense.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

    Thanks for all the pointers and links. I’d need to further look into this.

    Regading the last question:

    I don’t know what happens mathematically, but in terms of physics the sequence terminates because E n(n)E_{n(n)} is the U-duality group of the maximal 11-dimensional supergravity KK-compactified to dimension 11n11-n. So E 8(8)E_{8(8)} is the gauge group of maximal 3d supergravity and I guess E 9(9)E_{9(9)} as the “current algebra” in 2d supergravity is still pretty clear, but then beyond that it gets speculative: Hermann Nicolai conjectures that for 1-dimensional sugra we get the superparticle propagating on the “group manifold” E 10(10)E_{10(10)} (which is mathematically not really under control, I gather, but is at least a thoroughly plausible object that ought to exist) and then West went all the way and conjectures that KK-compactification all the way to the point yields E 11(11)E_{11(11)} as U-duality. This is curious now, since it means that a configuration of all of (conjecturally M-completed, with all non-perturbative M-brane effects and everything) 11d-Sugra is given by just picking one point in E 11(11)E_{11(11)}.

    West speaks about this in his textbook Introduction to Strings and Branes.

    I’d say this is enough speculation to chew on for the moment, that nobody would be well advised to speculate that “KK-compatification to (-1)-dimensions” (whatever that might mean) yields U-duality E 12(12)E_{12(12)} (whatever that might mean)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

    Wikipedia believes the series continues En. Qualifiers like affine, hyperbolic, Lorentzian seem to stop at 11 though.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 15th 2014

    Oh,right. Thanks.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 28th 2014

    added pointers to two review talks from last week,on the E 10E_{10}-case: by Thibault Damour and by Hermann Nicolai

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)