Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 15th 2012
   • (edited Mar 15th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexby chance I noticed that two days ago somebody created an entry _[[Circuitoids]]_. I am not sure what to do about it...

   by chance I noticed that two days ago somebody created an entry Circuitoids. I am not sure what to do about it…

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorFinnLawler
   • CommentTimeMar 15th 2012
   • (edited Mar 15th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: FinnLawler
   Format: MarkdownItexI noticed that too. The same author created [[generalized continuity]] a good while ago, which was discussed [here](http://nforum.mathforge.org/discussion/1162/generalized-continuity/). Perhaps the same course of action is warranted in this case?

   I noticed that too. The same author created generalized continuity a good while ago, which was discussed here. Perhaps the same course of action is warranted in this case?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorYaron
   • CommentTimeMar 15th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Yaron
   Format: MarkdownItexThere is also a new link from [[Categories and Sheaves]] to circuitoids (at the end).

   There is also a new link from Categories and Sheaves to circuitoids (at the end).

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 15th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks for the alert. I am removing that link. On that page this is close to being spam. I am worried about this. Maybe we should block the IP.

   Thanks for the alert. I am removing that link. On that page this is close to being spam.

   I am worried about this. Maybe we should block the IP.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeMar 17th 2012
   • (edited Mar 17th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexThanks, Finn, for bringing up that old conversation. Here is a quote from the start of the article linked to from the page: >The attempt presented in this article to generalize several directions in my research was to [sic] cumbersome. It appears that it’s better to consider every case individually without this generalization. This article is a blind valley in research. I don’t suggest to read the below. >This article is not to be published, because the author is not an expert in category theory. But it may be used as a part of my future writings on the topic of general topology. I would argue that this means it should not be linked to from the nLab. The author professes not to be an expert in category theory, and that the article is a 'blind valley'. Also, I think the page as written is non-sensical. I have deleted the contents.

   Thanks, Finn, for bringing up that old conversation.

   Here is a quote from the start of the article linked to from the page:

   The attempt presented in this article to generalize several directions in my research was to [sic] cumbersome. It appears that it’s better to consider every case individually without this generalization. This article is a blind valley in research. I don’t suggest to read the below.

   This article is not to be published, because the author is not an expert in category theory. But it may be used as a part of my future writings on the topic of general topology.

   I would argue that this means it should not be linked to from the nLab. The author professes not to be an expert in category theory, and that the article is a ’blind valley’.

   Also, I think the page as written is non-sensical. I have deleted the contents.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMar 17th 2012
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItex> I have deleted the contents. Thanks for taking care of this!

   I have deleted the contents.

   Thanks for taking care of this!