Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 30th 2012

    I’ve asked a question on Google+ about publishing: https://plus.google.com/u/0/103404025783539237119/posts/DBLoxrCUNwc. The paper in question is my anafunctors paper. If anyone has comments feel free to post them here.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorjim_stasheff
    • CommentTimeApr 30th 2012
    By all means, submit version C. As editor I would be happy to have such a rewrite. At worst, it might require a new ref.
    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeApr 30th 2012

    I agree, you should push toward the major revision, when the results are better. The editors and referees might be more conservative, but one should strongly push toward long term benefit, rather then publishing something what is obsolete already at the time of acceptance.

    BTW, David, you now work at the University (as it is written on google+) ? I remember you were writing that you went out of academia and doing math only in free time. You got back to full time academic job ?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeApr 30th 2012

    At the moment you have version C and its results. That could be submitted to the journal pointing out that it is a revised version of the earlier paper and so withdrawing that earlier version. The version D idea is fine, but you are not sure to get it out in a short time. (Perhaps if C is accepted and by the time it is about to be published you have version D ready you can add a note at the end of C saying that since this version was written you have managed to reduce the conditions even more, and this will appear in a separate paper ’in preparation’.)

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeApr 30th 2012
    • (edited May 1st 2012)

    @Zoran, no it is only an honorary position. I have the affiliation but no pay, so I’m still working outside academia.

    I should add I emailed the editor, and he was cool with version C.