Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
1 to 7 of 7
Please prevent me from making a silly mistake on a basic fact (if this is the case).
To fix notations, let the nerve functor from small categories to simplicial sets and the topological realization functor from simplicial sets to topological spaces. Then a functor induces a continuous function .
Now, my doubt: a natural transformation induces a homotopy between and regardless of the fact that is an isomorphism or not, right?
Right, because doesn’t know the difference between a category and its free groupoid.
2: After the realization it does not. But is fully faithful so it does. Are we speaking the same thing ?
Domenico, you are correct. But Zoran is also right that can tell the difference between a category and its free groupoid, and this also remains true after realization: the realization of the nerve of a groupoid is always a 1-type, whereas the realization of a nerve of a category can be any weak homotopy type. But maybe Toby meant to say “…and its free -groupoid”.
Domenico,
just to add one aspect: this is an important tool for producing homotopies. In particular it means that every adjunction is sent by the nerve to a homotopy equivalence. That’s a strong tool for producing homotopy equivalences. It’s the theme of Quillen’s theorems A and B, see at geometric realization of categories.
phew! :-)
thanks!
Never mind what I said.
1 to 7 of 7