Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
  1. Please prevent me from making a silly mistake on a basic fact (if this is the case).

    To fix notations, let NN the nerve functor from small categories to simplicial sets and |||\,| the topological realization functor from simplicial sets to topological spaces. Then a functor F:𝒞𝒟F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D} induces a continuous function |N(F)|:|N(𝒞)||N(𝒟)||N(F)|:|N(\mathcal{C})|\to |N(\mathcal{D})|.

    Now, my doubt: a natural transformation α:FG\alpha: F\Rightarrow G induces a homotopy between |N(F)||N(F)| and |N(G)||N(G)| regardless of the fact that α\alpha is an isomorphism or not, right?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2012

    Right, because NN doesn’t know the difference between a category and its free groupoid.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorzskoda
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2012

    2: After the realization it does not. But NN is fully faithful so it does. Are we speaking the same thing ?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2012

    Domenico, you are correct. But Zoran is also right that NN can tell the difference between a category and its free groupoid, and this also remains true after realization: the realization of the nerve of a groupoid is always a 1-type, whereas the realization of a nerve of a category can be any weak homotopy type. But maybe Toby meant to say “…and its free \infty-groupoid”.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2012

    Domenico,

    just to add one aspect: this is an important tool for producing homotopies. In particular it means that every adjunction is sent by the nerve to a homotopy equivalence. That’s a strong tool for producing homotopy equivalences. It’s the theme of Quillen’s theorems A and B, see at geometric realization of categories.

  2. phew! :-)

    thanks!

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2012

    Never mind what I said.