Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory object of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2012

    I have added a reference to Cheng-Gurski-Riehl to two-variable adjunction, and some comments about the cyclic action.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2019

    Added some references and redirects.

    diff, v13, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthormaxsnew
    • CommentTimeJan 8th 2019
    What's the right 2-category-like gadget in which to interpret n-variable adjunctions like how you can define an adjunction in any 2-category?
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeJan 8th 2019

    Good question! I ruminated about it 8-9 years ago here and here, but never got around to writing any more down.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorvarkor
    • CommentTimeDec 1st 2022

    Mention “adjunctions with a parameter”.

    diff, v14, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 10th 2023
    • (edited May 10th 2023)

    touched wording and typesetting

    added missing cross-link with adjoint functor

    re-organized and cleaned up the list of references (since MacLane71 seems to precede Gray80, I deleted the comment that the latter is “probably the earliest” occurrence of the notion)

    diff, v16, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorelias_guisado
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2023

    I don’t know if I’m getting the referencing format and placing right. Please, correct it if not.

    diff, v18, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorelias_guisado
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2023

    Messed up placing in last edit. Now corrected

    diff, v18, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeDec 16th 2023

    Looks good. But I have changed the wording of the preceding line, to make it fit the logic of the text before.

    diff, v19, current