Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeSep 27th 2012
   • (edited Sep 27th 2012)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexas mentioned in another thread, I have expanded the Idea-section at _[[polarization]]_ in order to highlight the relation to _[[canonical momenta]]_ (which I also edited accordingly).

   as mentioned in another thread, I have expanded the Idea-section at polarization in order to highlight the relation to canonical momenta (which I also edited accordingly).

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorcrogers
   • CommentTimeMar 22nd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: crogers
   Format: TextIn order to have something more than just "???" listed for polarization of "n-plectic oo-groupoid", I boldly added a citation to an example in my thesis where I consider a simple notion of "higher" real polarization of a 2-plectic manifold. It's far from the perfect answer, and it feels a bit dirty to self-promote, but it's the only place I know of in the literature where such a concept is actually used to geometrically quantize a 2-plectic manifold via higher structures.

   In order to have something more than just "???" listed for polarization of "n-plectic oo-groupoid", I boldly added a citation to an example in my thesis where I consider a simple notion of "higher" real polarization of a 2-plectic manifold. It's far from the perfect answer, and it feels a bit dirty to self-promote, but it's the only place I know of in the literature where such a concept is actually used to geometrically quantize a 2-plectic manifold via higher structures.