Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry bundles calculus categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-theory cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics comma complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science connection constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundations functional-analysis functor galois-theory gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry goodwillie-calculus graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory history homological homological-algebra homology homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie lie-theory limit limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal-logic model model-category-theory monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nonassociative noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pasting philosophy physics planar pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory subobject superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 23rd 2013
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorKarol Szumiło
    • CommentTimeFeb 23rd 2013

    I am puzzled by the choice of “van Kampen” as a name for this concept. Do you know where it comes from? Is it supposed to refer to the van Kampen theorem? In its most basic form it is a theorem about homotopy pushouts of spaces which happen to be “van Kampen” in this sense. But as far as I can tell there is no direct relation between the “van Kampen theorem” and “van Kampen colimits”. So is there some other justification for this name? Or maybe there is some relation to the van Kampen theorem I overlooked?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 24th 2013

    Thanks, nice entry.

    Where you point to HTT I added also a pointer to around example 1.2.3 in 2Cats+Goodwillie, where this kind of characterization of \infty-toposes reappears.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2013

    @Karol, I think the name in this context originates from the theory of adhesive categories, where it was indeed used for the pushouts there which have this property. In Lack and Sobocinski’s original paper “Adhesive categories”, they say

    The name van Kampen derives from the relationship between these squares and the van Kampen theorem in topology, in its “coverings version”, as presented for example in [2]. This relationship is described in detail in [18].

    The reference [18] is their paper “Toposes are adhesive”, which makes a connection to an abstract van Kampen theorem of Brown and Janelidze which I have not read.

    However, I find the name highly appropriate in retrospect, because it is precisely this property of colimits (and more generally higher inductive types) which underlies Dan Licata’s “encode/decode” technique for computing with homotopy groups in homotopy type theory. This technique has recently been responsible for many breakthroughs in formalizing homotopy theory in HoTT, including the calculation of π n(S n)\pi_n(S^n) (by Licata and Brunerie), the proof of the freudenthal suspension theorem (by Lumsdaine), and — I believe — also the classical van Kampen theorem!

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2013

    Dan Licata’s “encode/decode” technique

    What’s that technique?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeFeb 25th 2013

    It’s described for π 1(S 1)\pi_1(S^1) here.

    Sorry for the terse messages — I’m fighting a couple of deadlines right now and probably shouldn’t be showing up here at all. (-:

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorKarol Szumiło
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2013

    I’ve taken a look at the paper by Brown and Janelidze and I think I understand now (though I’m not completely clear on the details.) The definition of a van Kampen colimit morally says that the category of “fibrations” over the colimit is equivalent to the category of compatible families of “fibrations” over the original diagram whatever “fibration” should mean in the context of interest. The classical van Kampen theorem can be phrased in this language if we take “fibration” to mean “covering space”.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeMar 4th 2013

    That sounds right, I guess they are thinking of the topos-theoretic definition of π 1\pi_1 in terms of covering spaces or locally constant sheaves.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)