Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJul 4th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexTreating [[locally path-connected spaces]] as [[nice topological spaces]], we see that nice [[path-connected spaces]] are the same as nice [[connected spaces]], and the definition of the latter is more elementary (in point-set topology) than the former. Then nice [[simply connected spaces]] are the same as nice [unicoherent spaces](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicoherent_space), which are again more elementary. This should continue for the entire hierarchy of $n$-[[n-connected space|connected spaces]], so I wrote something there about it.

   Treating locally path-connected spaces as nice topological spaces, we see that nice path-connected spaces are the same as nice connected spaces, and the definition of the latter is more elementary (in point-set topology) than the former. Then nice simply connected spaces are the same as nice unicoherent spaces, which are again more elementary. This should continue for the entire hierarchy of $n$-connected spaces, so I wrote something there about it.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexSounds like the Cech-y definition of the fundamental $\infty$-groupoid.

   Sounds like the Cech-y definition of the fundamental $\infty$-groupoid.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexhence the _[[nerve theorem]]_.

   hence the nerve theorem.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJul 5th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexYes, that certainly seems to be related, although I don't know how to make it match up precisely.

   Yes, that certainly seems to be related, although I don’t know how to make it match up precisely.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
   • CommentTimeJul 6th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: TobyBartels
   Format: MarkdownItexI have removed that section as wrong. I was pretty sure that I had read about an elementary point-set equivalent of simple connectedness for nice topological spaces, and I found unicoherence, which seemed reasonable, but it doesn't work. (Specifically, the projective plane is unicoherent but not simply connected.) I can keep searching, or maybe I hallucinated this idea, or maybe we should extract something correct from the nerve theorem. But I don't have a correct replacement for now.

   I have removed that section as wrong. I was pretty sure that I had read about an elementary point-set equivalent of simple connectedness for nice topological spaces, and I found unicoherence, which seemed reasonable, but it doesn’t work. (Specifically, the projective plane is unicoherent but not simply connected.) I can keep searching, or maybe I hallucinated this idea, or maybe we should extract something correct from the nerve theorem. But I don’t have a correct replacement for now.