Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeAug 12th 2013
   • (edited Aug 13th 2014)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexstub for _[[groupoid K-theory]]_, for the moment just to record some pointers

   stub for groupoid K-theory, for the moment just to record some pointers

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorCharles Rezk
   • CommentTimeAug 13th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Charles Rezk
   Format: MarkdownItexYou have: "For local quotient groupoids one can define their K-theory as, essentially, the Grothendieck group of equivariant vector bundles on the groupoid." I don't think this is true in such generality. Is there a reference?

   You have: “For local quotient groupoids one can define their K-theory as, essentially, the Grothendieck group of equivariant vector bundles on the groupoid.” I don’t think this is true in such generality. Is there a reference?

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeAug 14th 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexThis brief remark was meant to refer to [FHT I](http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Loop+Groups+and+Twisted+K-Theory). I should add the details...

   This brief remark was meant to refer to FHT I. I should add the details…