Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration finite foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorporton
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: porton
   Format: MarkdownItexXXX is a pair $(C;V)$ or a category $C$ and a functor $V:\mathbf{Rel}\rightarrow C$. How would you suggest to name XXX?

   XXX is a pair $(C;V)$ or a category $C$ and a functor $V:\mathbf{Rel}\rightarrow C$.

   How would you suggest to name XXX?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorporton
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: porton
   Format: MarkdownItexProbably I will add more requirements, such as $V$ being full or faithful, I'm yet unsure.

   Probably I will add more requirements, such as $V$ being full or faithful, I’m yet unsure.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorporton
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: porton
   Format: MarkdownItexWhat's about "category on top of $\mathbf{Rel}$"? Is this term taken?

   What’s about “category on top of $\mathbf{Rel}$”? Is this term taken?

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItex>category on top of Rel no, this is a category _under_ Rel. It's an object in Rel/Cat. But more important is the concept of morphism between these things, as I can imagine several contenders.

   category on top of Rel

   no, this is a category under Rel. It’s an object in Rel/Cat. But more important is the concept of morphism between these things, as I can imagine several contenders.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorporton
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: porton
   Format: MarkdownItexAnd what's about to name the functor $V$ "remembrance functor"? (It is mapping a less structured category into a more structured category, just reverse to "forgetful" functors, so "remembrance".) If not "remembrance" then how to call it?

   And what’s about to name the functor $V$ “remembrance functor”? (It is mapping a less structured category into a more structured category, just reverse to “forgetful” functors, so “remembrance”.)

   If not “remembrance” then how to call it?

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItex"Category under Rel" sounds fine to me.

   “Category under Rel” sounds fine to me.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorzskoda
   • CommentTimeOct 23rd 2013
   • PermaLink
   Author: zskoda
   Format: MarkdownItexI second Mike's opinion.

   I second Mike’s opinion.