# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJan 31st 2014
• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
• CommentTimeJan 31st 2014

So properties there are related to the $K(n)$ being ’field spectra’ (p. 18 of notes)?

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeJan 31st 2014
• (edited Jan 31st 2014)

I suppose that plays a role in the proof at some point. But they emphasize that the statement does not follow from abstract properties of anything. They emphasize that the proof uses the hard computations of $K(n)$-(co)-homology of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces in

• Ravenel, D. and S. Wilson. The Morava K-theories of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces and the Conner-Floyd conjecture. Amer. J. Math. 102 (1980), no. 4, 691748.

• Johnson, D. and S. Wilson. The Brown-Peterson homology of elementary p-groups. Amer. J. Math. 107 (1985), no. 2, 427453.