Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2014
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2014

    So properties there are related to the K(n)K(n) being ’field spectra’ (p. 18 of notes)?

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2014
    • (edited Jan 31st 2014)

    I suppose that plays a role in the proof at some point. But they emphasize that the statement does not follow from abstract properties of anything. They emphasize that the proof uses the hard computations of K(n)K(n)-(co)-homology of Eilenberg-MacLane spaces in

    • Ravenel, D. and S. Wilson. The Morava K-theories of Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces and the Conner-Floyd conjecture. Amer. J. Math. 102 (1980), no. 4, 691748.

    • Johnson, D. and S. Wilson. The Brown-Peterson homology of elementary p-groups. Amer. J. Math. 107 (1985), no. 2, 427453.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)