# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorMike Shulman
• CommentTimeNov 29th 2015

The FAQ says under the heading “My LaTeX produces gobbledygook in iTeX and vice versa” that

$t^3,2$ renders as $t^3,2$ instead of $t^{3},2$

but to me, both renderings look the same, with the “,2” outside the superscript. Has iTeX changed since this FAQ was written?

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorTobyBartels
• CommentTimeNov 30th 2015

Perhaps, or perhaps it was supposed to be a period all along: $t^3.2$.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorMike Shulman
• CommentTimeNov 30th 2015

I think the surrounding text makes it clear that it was supposed to be a comma.

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorTobyBartels
• CommentTimeDec 6th 2015

The text makes it clear that it was expected to work with either. I don't know if it ever did work with either, and if so, for which versions of iTeX.

I've changed the example to use a period, so that it works, with a comment about how strange it is that the comma behaves differently now.

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorTobyBartels
• CommentTimeDec 6th 2015

There appears to be another change; the last item under gobbledygook claims that $\text{∞}$ shouldn't parse, but it does. (There's even a helpful example to show that the text is wrong!) I can rewrite that, but I thought that I'd point it out first.