Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

n-Forum: Science of Logic discussion down

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2015

    When I try to look at the Science of Logic discussion here, I’m getting

    page contains the following errors:

    error on line 93 at column 163: Extra content at the end of the document Below is a rendering of the page up to the first error.

    and

    Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /home/nlab/www/nforum/extensions/XHTMLValidator/default.php on line 2949

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeJan 3rd 2016

    My browser will show the page, but still the discussion is gone, and replaced entirely by that fatal error that you've quoted above. I don't think that this is the only Forum page that's had this problem.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthortonyjones
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016

    Got the same problem. Any help?

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016
    • (edited Sep 6th 2016)

    I tried on Firefox. Blank page. Get the error message on Chrome and Safari hangs on it.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthortonyjones
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016

    The last page of the discussion loads okay, but the first page is a no go. So frustrating.

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorTim_Porter
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016

    Starting from comment 101 you can get the discussion by searching on the title, but the earlier pages do not seem to be accessible.Here is a link.

  7. A simple solution might be to reduce the number of comments visible on a page. I guess Adeel would need to be contacted about that.

    If there is a lot of LaTeX, the discussions load extremely slowly on my browser (webkit based) due to the MathJax processing. So I’d vote for quite a low number of comments visible, say 25.

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthortonyjones
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016

    I also wondered whether reducing the number of comments per page might help. Its not the only discussion which is inaccessible at the moment either. The wiki history of the universe discussion is another.

1 to 8 of 8

  1.