Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 11th 2016
    • (edited Jan 11th 2016)

    At the old entry cohomotopy used to be a section on how it may be thought of as a special case of non-abelian cohomology. While I (still) think this is an excellent point to highlight, re-reading this old paragraph now made me feel that it was rather clumsily expressed. Therefore I have rewritten (and shortened) it, now the third paragraph of the Idea-section.

    (We had had long discussion about this entry back in the days, but it must have been before we switched to nForum discussion, because on the nForum there seems to be no trace of it.)

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJan 11th 2016

    Back over here and here.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2018
    • (edited Mar 15th 2018)

    briefly recorded some facts (here) on cohomotopy of 4-manifolds, from Kirby-Melvin-Teichner 12

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 18th 2018

    added a few words in the Properties-section on the isomorphism between cohomotopy classes of smooth manifolds and the (normally framed) cobordism group in complementary dimension: here

    diff, v12, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 28th 2018

    copied to here the remark about configuration spaces of points with labels in S nS^n computing (twisted, unstable) cohomotopy (here)

    diff, v18, current

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeMay 6th 2019

    added pointer to

    diff, v30, current

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2019
    • (edited Aug 23rd 2019)

    added graphics (here) illustrating the unstable Pontrjagin-Thom isomorphism

    diff, v33, current

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2019

    added also a graphics (here) illustrating the example of π n(( n) cpt)\pi^n\big( (\mathbb{R}^n)^{cpt}\big) \simeq \mathbb{Z} under the PT-iso

    diff, v34, current

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2019

    added also graphics (here) illustrating the 2\mathbb{Z}_2-equivariant version of the previous example.

    Am adding the same illustration also to the respective discussion at equivariant Hopf degree theorem

    diff, v35, current

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2019
    • (edited Aug 23rd 2019)

    [duplicate announcement deleted]

    diff, v35, current

    • CommentRowNumber11.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2019

    further in this sequence of examples: added graphics (here) illustrating the equivariant Cohomotopy of toroidal orientifolds

    diff, v36, current

    • CommentRowNumber12.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeAug 31st 2019

    added one more graphics (here), meant to illustrated how the normal framing of the submanifolds encodes the sign of the “Cohomotopy charge” which these carry, under PT

    diff, v37, current

    • CommentRowNumber13.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeSep 27th 2019
    • (edited Sep 27th 2019)

    have added pointer to

    where those graphics are taken from

    diff, v39, current

    • CommentRowNumber14.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 6th 2019

    added these references on Cohomotopy cocycle spaces:

    diff, v41, current

    • CommentRowNumber15.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago
    • (edited 2 days ago)

    prodded by Dmitri (here) I have added a remark on terminology (here). In the course of this I ended up considerably expanding the Idea-section; now it has also a subsection “As the absolute cohomology theory” (here)

    diff, v46, current

    • CommentRowNumber16.
    • CommentAuthorDmitri Pavlov
    • CommentTime2 days ago
    Thanks! In the table of flavors of Cohomotopy, shouldn't we also have differential Cohomotopy?
    • CommentRowNumber17.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTime2 days ago

    Yes! Eventually we need a higher dimensional table. Or a table of tables.

    Personally, of course I am eager to go full blown into twisted equivariant differential Cohomotopy of super orbifolds. And Vincent has a bunch of ideas for what to do. But to make sure not to be barking up the wrong tree, we’d first like to finish one or two further consistency checks in the “topological sector” first.

    But that’s just me. If you want to go ahead creating more nLab entries on further variants, please do.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)