Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology definitions deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexis there a way to make tables such as the following come out looking better: | $k =$ | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | $\cdots$ | |--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--| | $\pi_k(\mathbb{S}) = $ | $\mathbb{Z}$ | $\mathbb{Z}_2$ | $\mathbb{Z}_2$ | $\mathbb{Z}_{24}$ | $0$ | $0$ | $\mathbb{Z}_2$ | $\mathbb{Z}_{240}$ | $(\mathbb{Z}_2)^2$ | $(\mathbb{Z}_2)^3$ | $\mathbb{Z}_6$ | $\mathbb{Z}_{504}$ | $0$ | $\mathbb{Z}_3$ | $(\mathbb{Z}_2)^2$ | $\mathbb{Z}_{480} \oplus \mathbb{Z}_2$ | $\cdots$ | ? There needs to be more padding in the cells, and best also some harmonization of the cell sizes. Anyone knows what one could do?

   is there a way to make tables such as the following come out looking better:

   $k =$	0	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	$\cdots$
   $\pi_k(\mathbb{S}) =$	$\mathbb{Z}$	$\mathbb{Z}_2$	$\mathbb{Z}_2$	$\mathbb{Z}_{24}$	$0$	$0$	$\mathbb{Z}_2$	$\mathbb{Z}_{240}$	$(\mathbb{Z}_2)^2$	$(\mathbb{Z}_2)^3$	$\mathbb{Z}_6$	$\mathbb{Z}_{504}$	$0$	$\mathbb{Z}_3$	$(\mathbb{Z}_2)^2$	$\mathbb{Z}_{480} \oplus \mathbb{Z}_2$	$\cdots$

   ?

   There needs to be more padding in the cells, and best also some harmonization of the cell sizes. Anyone knows what one could do?

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeMay 13th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexHm, interesting. Now that I see the table come out here on the $n$Forum: here it looks a little different and in fact a tad better than on the $n$Lab page ([here](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/homotopy+groups+of+spheres#Tables)). Not really good yet, but a tad better.

   Hm, interesting. Now that I see the table come out here on the $n$Forum: here it looks a little different and in fact a tad better than on the $n$Lab page (here). Not really good yet, but a tad better.