Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > Latest Changes: category of G sets

Bottom of Page

1 to 8 of 8

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthordec41
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    I’ve started a page category of G sets. I will continue to fill in more details as I have time. Some of the information from ZFA can probably be moved here.

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    Great, but it does need to be linked to existing pages such as G-set, topological G-space and permutation representation. You may find that this suggests some reorganisation of existing material.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    Yes. I think the G-set page can talk about topological groups as well. (I'm the same person as OP, but thought I should use my real name instead - didn't realize username was the same as the displayed name when signing up)
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    One thing. We have tended to use a capitalised form ’X’ for ’the category of xs’, sometimes with abbreviations, so Set, Cat, Grpd, Infinity-Grpd, FinSet, etc. That policy would be awkward here since the ’G’ of ’G-set’ is already a capital. ’G-Set’ would be natural, but perhaps too subtle.

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    The Elephant uses Cont(G) to denote the category, while MacLane and Moerdijk uses BG. I thought BG might be confusing here, since "B" is often taken to mean "delooping" in the nLab, so I opted for something that resembles the Elephant's usage.

    I tend to imagine Cont (or Cts) as something like a functor TopGrp -> Cat that sends each group to the corresponding category, similar to how we write Sh(C, J) for the category of sheaves on a site.

    Another possible notation is Cts-G-Set.
    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016

    We also have MSet and Understanding M-Set.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    I'll go for GSet, then.
    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
    • CommentTimeJul 14th 2016
    Added a few more basic properties about the topos.

1 to 8 of 8

  1.