Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
   • CommentTimeJul 15th 2016
   • (edited Jul 16th 2016)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dexter Chua
   Format: MarkdownItexCreated the page [Fraenkel-Mostowski model](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Fraenkel-Mostowski+model) and populated it with basic definitions and information moved from [ZFA](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/ZFA)

   Created the page Fraenkel-Mostowski model and populated it with basic definitions and information moved from ZFA

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorspitters
   • CommentTimeJul 15th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: spitters
   Format: MarkdownItexThere are already entries for [[Schanuel topos]] and [[nominal set]].

   There are already entries for Schanuel topos and nominal set.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
   • CommentTimeJul 16th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dexter Chua
   Format: MarkdownItexIn the category-theoretic approach (moved from the previous ZFA page), do we have to require the each element of the sets to have an open stabilizer? This would correspond to requiring the sets in the classical permutation model to be hereditarily symmetric, rather than just being symmetric.

   In the category-theoretic approach (moved from the previous ZFA page), do we have to require the each element of the sets to have an open stabilizer? This would correspond to requiring the sets in the classical permutation model to be hereditarily symmetric, rather than just being symmetric.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJul 17th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItex>do we have to require the each element of the sets to have an open stabilizer? Depends what you are needing. Maybe I was thinking of symmetric models at the same time if it was me that wrote it (I guess I did).

   do we have to require the each element of the sets to have an open stabilizer?

   Depends what you are needing. Maybe I was thinking of symmetric models at the same time if it was me that wrote it (I guess I did).

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorDexter Chua
   • CommentTimeJul 18th 2016
   • PermaLink
   Author: Dexter Chua
   Format: MarkdownItexIf we take a set in a permutation model, then it's elements would have open stabilizers, so I believe this should be reflected in the corresponding category. This also corresponds to the action of the group being continuous (if the set is given the discrete topology), which is by itself a natural thing to require if we are given a topological group.

   If we take a set in a permutation model, then it’s elements would have open stabilizers, so I believe this should be reflected in the corresponding category. This also corresponds to the action of the group being continuous (if the set is given the discrete topology), which is by itself a natural thing to require if we are given a topological group.