Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).

nLab > nLab General Discussions: inductive-inductive type

Bottom of Page

1 to 10 of 10

  1.  
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    Gaëtan Gilbert’s new paper, Formalising Real Numbers in Homotopy Type Theory, ( arXiv:1610.05072) speaks of higher inductive-inductive types. We don’t have anything on this, but I see the other wiki, Homotopy Type Theory, at least has an entry inductive-inductive type. Where are we with regard to the relationship between the wikis? The HoTT one seems not terribly active if you look at their Latest Revisions, so not likely to see something useful out there, like Andrej Bauer’s comments on induction-induction, and add it to an entry. Probably better then to begin our own entry, don’t you think?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016
    • (edited Oct 19th 2016)

    I’d just copy over the material to inductive-inductive type, add attribution, add more hyperlinks, add more references, fine-tune the formatting, and add cross-links.

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    So I’ve also started inductive-recursive type.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    Is there anything special to privilege those two combinations over recursive-recursive and recursive-inductive?

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    I am not sure what it would mean for the underlying set to be recursively defined. Recursively over what?

    • CommentRowNumber6.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    I was just borrowing from Bauer here who is borrowing from Fredrik Nordvall Forsberg and Anton Setzer. I’ve copied in an example they give.

    The professionals should be writing these entries, but perhaps a nudge will help.

    • CommentRowNumber7.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    A “recursive-recursive type” sounds a little bit like a very dependent function, maybe?

    • CommentRowNumber8.
    • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
    • CommentTimeOct 19th 2016

    Oh sorry I see now #5 was addressed to #4.

    • CommentRowNumber9.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2017

    Added a reference to the QIIT paper.

    • CommentRowNumber10.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2018

    We sharpened the statement a little in discussion with Ambrus Kaprosi

1 to 10 of 10

  1.