Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory infinity integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic manifolds mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorelif
    • CommentTimeMar 10th 2017
    In, why does Majıd need the condition (1) in the definition 2.1?
    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2017
    • (edited Mar 11th 2017)

    Better formatting and linking to the abstract page: Strict quantum 2-groups

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthorelif
    • CommentTimeMar 11th 2017
    Ok. Why does Majıd need the condition (1) in the definition 2.1?
    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthorTobyBartels
    • CommentTimeMay 31st 2017

    I assume that you're asking why he needs the equation

    h (1)h (2)a=h (2)h (1)a h_{(1)} \otimes h_{(2)} \triangleright a = h_{(2)} \otimes h_{(1)} \triangleright a

    (for hh in the ground Hopf algebra HH and aa in the Hopf HH-algebra AA), rather than the entire set-up in that condition; without that set-up (consisting of HH and AA themselves), you'd have nothing to talk about.

    I don't remember enough about Hopf algebras to answer your question either, but I'm trying to understand it. ☺️