Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorBruno Stonek
    • CommentTimeApr 13th 2017

    In cartesian monoidal categories, Paragraph 2, a result is stated: “Moreover, one can show that any symmetric monoidal category…”.

    Does anyone have a reference where this result is explicitly stated?

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorTodd_Trimble
    • CommentTimeApr 13th 2017
    • (edited Apr 13th 2017)

    It could be ancient as folklore, but I think Tom Fox is one name I’d check for an explicit reference to this statement. It might be for example here, but this is behind a paywall for me at the moment. It certainly plays a role in Cartesian Bicategories by Carboni and Walters, so I’d check there too.

  1. It’s in Chris Heunen and Jamie Vicary’s notes on Categorical Quantum Mechanics, for example page 84 of the copy available here. They view it as a form of the no-cloning theorem; if a category of processes has cloning (a diagonal map) then it must be classical (cartesian).

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthormaxsnew
    • CommentTimeApr 14th 2017

    This is also a theorem that is taken for granted in Programming Languages research, where the syntactic interpretation is that Linear Logic is a refinement of Intuitionistic Logic in that you can translate intuitionistic logic into Linear Logic + weakening (drop) + contraction (duplication), so you may find a citation in early work on linear logic.