Not signed in (Sign In)

Start a new discussion

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Discussion Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorUrs
    • CommentTimeJan 4th 2018

    at S-matrix and elsewhere is reference to the “causal order“-relation, the relation saying that for a pair (S 1,S 2)(S_1,S_2) of subsets of a spacetime, S 1S_1 does not intersect the past of S 2S_2, or equivalently that S 2S_2 does not intersect the future of S 1S_1.

    (Following a suggestion by Arnold Neumaier, a neat suggestive notation for this is S 1S 2S_1 {\vee\!\!\!\wedge} S_2, which I have been implementing now at S-matrix.)

    I am starting to give this concept its own entry, currently titled “causal order”; but what’s good terminology?

    This relation {\vee\!\!\!\wedge} is not really an ordering, since it is not transitive. It would seem tempting to say “causal relation”, but googling for this term shows that has an different established meaning.

Add your comments
  • Please log in or leave your comment as a "guest post". If commenting as a "guest", please include your name in the message as a courtesy. Note: only certain categories allow guest posts.
  • To produce a hyperlink to an nLab entry, simply put double square brackets around its name, e.g. [[category]]. To use (La)TeX mathematics in your post, make sure Markdown+Itex is selected below and put your mathematics between dollar signs as usual. Only a subset of the usual TeX math commands are accepted: see here for a list.

  • (Help)