Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Isn’t the correct definition of compatible family of elements: $(s_i \in AU_i)$ satisfying: $p_i f = p_j g \implies Afx_i = Agx_j$
You’re quite right, Tyler! Thank you for bringing this to attention. :-) I just fixed the entry. (Over at coverage, we already had the correct condition.)
Excellent! Happy to help.
1 to 3 of 3