Not signed in (Sign In)

Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

  • Sign in using OpenID

Site Tag Cloud

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nforum nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf sheaves simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to nForum
If you want to take part in these discussions either sign in now (if you have an account), apply for one now (if you don't).
    • CommentRowNumber1.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2018

    Mention that geometric homotopy type theory is not well-defined yet.

    diff, v8, current

    • CommentRowNumber2.
    • CommentAuthorspitters
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2019

    Link to HITs

    diff, v9, current

    • CommentRowNumber3.
    • CommentAuthormbid
    • CommentTimeApr 21st 2019

    I’m not sure higher inductive types, in the sense of a generalization of W-types, would make sense in a geometric homotopy type theory. 1-categorically, W-types are defined as initial algebras of polynomial endofunctors, and these make sense only if there are dependent products, which are, however, not stable under inverse image. Arithmetic universes, which should be precisely the models of whatever geometric type theory is, have free models for all (finite) finite limit theories. I’ve been told that it does not follow from this that an arithmetic universe U has all W-types even if U happens to be lcc. Having just free models to finite limit theories is thus strictly weaker than having W-types. So I think the infinity categorical version of geometric type theory should similarly have free models for finite hlimit theories instead of W-types.

    • CommentRowNumber4.
    • CommentAuthormbid
    • CommentTimeApr 21st 2019

    Mention essentially algebraic (infinity,1) theories instead of higher inductive types

    diff, v10, current

    • CommentRowNumber5.
    • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
    • CommentTimeApr 22nd 2019

    Clarified further the relationship.

    diff, v11, current