# Start a new discussion

## Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

## Site Tag Cloud

Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

• CommentRowNumber1.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeApr 25th 2018

this table used to be hidden at supersymmetry, but it really ought to cross-link its entries. Therefore here its stand-alone version, for !inclusion

• CommentRowNumber2.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeApr 30th 2019

There are a bunch of supergroups here that use $/$ instead of what I guess should be $\vert$, but it’s not clear.

• CommentRowNumber3.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeApr 30th 2019
• (edited Apr 30th 2019)

True, we could try to harmonize. The slash in the definition of the orthosymplectic supergroup is written both ways in the literature, fairly evenly distributed, I think.

We could either make the slashes here be straight or those at orthosymplectic supergroup be slanted.

But I guess I would agree and also prefer having them straight here.

• CommentRowNumber4.
• CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
• CommentTimeApr 30th 2019

The reason it’s not clear when $/$ is used is that in principle it could mean some integer that is the result of dividing the numbers as shown. Is $OSp(n/k)$ supposed to be some symmetry group involving $n/k$-dimensional space, or $(n\vert k)$-dimensional superspace? (question is rhetorical)

• CommentRowNumber5.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeApr 30th 2019

Sure. Somebody has changed the notation to \vert now.

• CommentRowNumber6.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeSep 23rd 2019

finally completed the row for D=5, adding pointer to D4-brane and D=5 SYM

• CommentRowNumber7.
• CommentAuthorUrs
• CommentTimeOct 27th 2020

fixed previously broken link to Nahm 78