Not signed in

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

• Username
• Password
• Remember me

• Sign in using OpenID
• Remember me

• Forgot your password?
• Apply for membership

2-category 2-category-theory abelian-categories adjoint algebra algebraic algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology analysis analytic-geometry arithmetic arithmetic-geometry book bundles calculus categorical categories category category-theory chern-weil-theory cohesion cohesive-homotopy-type-theory cohomology colimits combinatorics complex complex-geometry computable-mathematics computer-science constructive cosmology deformation-theory descent diagrams differential differential-cohomology differential-equations differential-geometry digraphs duality elliptic-cohomology enriched fibration foundation foundations functional-analysis functor gauge-theory gebra geometric-quantization geometry graph graphs gravity grothendieck group group-theory harmonic-analysis higher higher-algebra higher-category-theory higher-differential-geometry higher-geometry higher-lie-theory higher-topos-theory homological homological-algebra homotopy homotopy-theory homotopy-type-theory index-theory integration integration-theory internal-categories k-theory lie-theory limits linear linear-algebra locale localization logic mathematics measure measure-theory modal modal-logic model model-category-theory monad monads monoidal monoidal-category-theory morphism motives motivic-cohomology nlab noncommutative noncommutative-geometry number-theory of operads operator operator-algebra order-theory pages pasting philosophy physics pro-object probability probability-theory quantization quantum quantum-field quantum-field-theory quantum-mechanics quantum-physics quantum-theory question representation representation-theory riemannian-geometry scheme schemes set set-theory sheaf simplicial space spin-geometry stable-homotopy-theory stack string string-theory superalgebra supergeometry svg symplectic-geometry synthetic-differential-geometry terminology theory topology topos topos-theory tqft type type-theory universal variational-calculus

1. • CommentRowNumber1.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJun 5th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexWhy don't we have an electronic nSeminar? [HoTTEST](http://uwo.ca/math/faculty/kapulkin/seminars/hottest.html) has been a big success, and [Zoom](https://zoom.us/) works really well for large meetings.

   Why don’t we have an electronic nSeminar? HoTTEST has been a big success, and Zoom works really well for large meetings.

2. • CommentRowNumber2.
   • CommentAuthorDavid_Corfield
   • CommentTimeJun 5th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: David_Corfield
   Format: MarkdownItexThere's an idea. Hmm, maybe we could tie in some people speaking virtually at a conference I'm going to arrange for 2019.

   There’s an idea. Hmm, maybe we could tie in some people speaking virtually at a conference I’m going to arrange for 2019.

3. • CommentRowNumber3.
   • CommentAuthorDavidRoberts
   • CommentTimeJun 5th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: DavidRoberts
   Format: MarkdownItexI like the idea.

   I like the idea.

4. • CommentRowNumber4.
   • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
   • CommentTimeJun 5th 2018
   • (edited Jun 5th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Richard Williamson
   Format: MarkdownItexSounds good! Do you mean a seminar on higher category theory, as opposed to specifically the nLab? Or maybe, anything covered by the nLab, including and actively welcoming category theory and higher category theory, but not necessarily limited to this? We could also consider making use of this kind of technology in other ways. E.g. there might sometimes be a reason to have a quick meeting or discussion about a certain topic.

   Sounds good! Do you mean a seminar on higher category theory, as opposed to specifically the nLab? Or maybe, anything covered by the nLab, including and actively welcoming category theory and higher category theory, but not necessarily limited to this?

   We could also consider making use of this kind of technology in other ways. E.g. there might sometimes be a reason to have a quick meeting or discussion about a certain topic.

5. • CommentRowNumber5.
   • CommentAuthorMike Shulman
   • CommentTimeJun 6th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Mike Shulman
   Format: MarkdownItexWe could do whatever we wanted, of course, but I was thinking of a seminar on any topics of interest to the nLab community. Not all the "seminar meetings" would have to be standard prepared talks either; we could use some of them as "hackathons" or brainstorming sessions to work together on improving some particular cluster of nLab pages, or as you say to discuss any currently important topic.

   We could do whatever we wanted, of course, but I was thinking of a seminar on any topics of interest to the nLab community. Not all the “seminar meetings” would have to be standard prepared talks either; we could use some of them as “hackathons” or brainstorming sessions to work together on improving some particular cluster of nLab pages, or as you say to discuss any currently important topic.

6. • CommentRowNumber6.
   • CommentAuthorRichard Williamson
   • CommentTimeJun 6th 2018
   • PermaLink
   Author: Richard Williamson
   Format: MarkdownItexSounds like a good definition and plan to me.

   Sounds like a good definition and plan to me.

7. • CommentRowNumber7.
   • CommentAuthorUrs
   • CommentTimeJun 12th 2018
   • (edited Jun 12th 2018)
   • PermaLink
   Author: Urs
   Format: MarkdownItexI am much in favor of more interaction among the $n$Lab community. If an electronic seminar helps you and others accomplish this, I will follow with interest. For a long time we have been lacking good interaction concerning joint $n$Lab editing. For instance, if the thoughts on adjoint type theory and $n$-theories had made some appearance here, various recent exchanges would probably have been less frustrating.

   I am much in favor of more interaction among the $n$Lab community. If an electronic seminar helps you and others accomplish this, I will follow with interest.

   For a long time we have been lacking good interaction concerning joint $n$Lab editing. For instance, if the thoughts on adjoint type theory and $n$-theories had made some appearance here, various recent exchanges would probably have been less frustrating.